Modern plant control room and computer monitors
Editorial

The 4 Forces That Will Define Enterprise AI This Year

5 minute read
Edward Funnekotter avatar
By
SAVED
After two years of hype, AI has to earn its keep. The companies that succeed will be the ones that treat it like serious engineering.

After two years of dazzling AI pilots, this is the year businesses face a crucial reality check. It's now very clear that enterprise-wide applications like agentic AI are in a different league from the quick wins of the burgeoning number of bottom-up one-dimensional AI point solutions. The realization is there, businesses are already questioning whether they can run AI effectively and safely at scale.

PwC, in its 2026 AI Business Predictions, sets out the issue before us: "Because AI feels easy to use, early wins can mask deeper challenges. But real results take precision in picking a few spots where AI can deliver wholesale transformation in ways that matter for the business, then executing with steady discipline that starts with senior leadership."

The last two years were defined by the explosive promise of generative AI, then followed the agentic-driven rush. Now is the reckoning, one that truly shows which AI applications make the grade. We are moving away from the initial rush of excitement and getting back to real business value. While the models themselves continue to improve, the focus for enterprises is shifting from "what can this cool demo do?" to "how do we run this safely in production?"

Here are four key trends that I see defining the AI landscape going forward: 

Table of Contents

1. It's Judgement Day for the AI Bubble

Despite the technological leaps of the last two years, there is a looming pin that may burst the AI hype bubble. The industry is bracing for a reality check as AI transitions from experimental pilots to robust AI applications that have the rigor to stand up to everyday use in industries that demand real-time delivery in order to match customer, supplier and employee expectations.

In mid-2025, research found that 95% of investments in generative AI produced zero results. The issue isn't that the models aren't capable, it's that there is a massive gulf between a prototype built in three days and a secure production system. Going forward, we may see high-profile failures where companies give models "too much rope" without adequate guardrails, resulting in reputational damage or data loss.

This is a signal that we need to apply what can be considered traditional, reliable engineering principles to these systems. The bottom-up adoption where workers find tangible, small-scale uses for AI remains highly successful, while massive top-down initiatives struggle. Here's where a cohesive architecture designed specifically for the complexity of the enterprise comes into its own.

We need to treat AI projects not as standalone science experiments, but as first-class citizens of the IT landscape, and this is precisely what an agent mesh does. An agent mesh provides a real-time data platform that connects AI agents to the nervous system of the enterprise. Supported by a sturdy event-driven platform, an agent mesh will fundamentally transform how agentic AI systems serve users, respond to business events and integrate with enterprise data, allowing any AI project — from simple single-agent to powerful multi-agent orchestrated solutions — to interact in real-time with enterprise applications and data.

2. The Right Architecture Will Serve Up the Right Data 

AI's power lies in its ability to process large amounts of natural language much faster and cheaper than the human mind. As businesses race to give AI agents access to internal documents, SharePoint and live web searches, we are creating a high-risk environment for data commingling. The value of agentic AI lies in its ability to make decisions without constant human oversight, but that autonomy creates a conflict: how do you trust a system with the keys to the shop?

The threat landscape is evolving at pace. We are already seeing real concerns around "prompt injection," where nefarious actors embed malicious text blobs into web pages. When an agent fetches that page to summarize a topic, the hidden text acts like a hypnotist's keyword, overriding the AI's instructions and forcing it to exfiltrate internal data. Or, imagine an agent accidentally copying confidential salary information or commercially sensitive data into a public setting because it "made sense" to the model at that moment.

Ahead, we will see a heavy focus on data management to solve this. The goal is to prevent the AI model from ingesting raw data unnecessarily. Instead of feeding an LLM a thousand rows of a database — which is slow, expensive and prone to hallucination — we need systems where the AI simply directs a software tool to filter the data and return only the relevant answer. This is where an agent mesh can enforce intelligent data management that only passes relevant information to the AI model. Not only does this mean better data security, it also helps reduce AI compute costs and avoids hallucinations.

Related Article: 4 Ways AI Is Actually Changing the Rules of Work

3. Forget Prompt Engineering — Context Engineering Is King 

Because of the way its memory currently works, it is hard for AI to feel like a human colleague. Currently, most interactions are stateless, meaning each interaction is a fresh start, because the AI has, at present, limited ability to remember previous context once a session ends. This has been partially addressed by auto-learned memory, where AI systems automatically store, recall and learn from past interactions and experiences without explicit human programming for each specific memory. However, even with auto-learned memory, it is not always a given that the AI will apply this in the correct manner.

Humans, on the other hand, are excellent at context switching. For instance, we behave differently with an acquaintance than we do with a close colleague. AI struggles with this nuance. If a system remembers everything, it might apply personal context to a business decision where it doesn't belong.

This will drive the rise of context engineering. It is no longer just about prompt engineering, it's about organizing the metadata, history and tools provided to the model. We need to build architectures that allow us to swap rules of engagement dynamically, ensuring the AI uses the correct memory for the specific task at hand.

Overcoming these limitations requires a disciplined approach to managing and delivering the right context at the right time — standard work for a communication backbone powered by an agent mesh. AI agents are then fed real-time events, ensuring they can operate and react with up-to-the-second awareness for decision-making.

4. It's Time for Multi-Agent Systems

Just as a single human cannot be an expert in every department of a company, a single AI agent cannot hold the context for an entire enterprise. If you try to add too much information to one agent, its performance degrades.

Just like in a human organization, a manager agent who can asynchronously orchestrate work among a group of expert agents with different skill sets can produce more sophisticated and accurate outcomes than a single generalist agent who must keep all the business context in mind without going deep into any specific domain. The solution is a "team" of specialized agents working together — orchestrated by Agent-to-Agent (A2A) communications. We are already seeing the emergence of protocols like the Model Context Protocol (MCP) and Google's A2A standards.

To make agentic AI systems work, businesses need a robust transport layer, which an agent mesh provides. That allows these agents to subscribe to events, communicate asynchronously and solve complex workflows securely. This approach not only enables each agent to operate at peak efficiency within its specialization, but also allows tasks to be executed in parallel, reducing overall response time.

Learning Opportunities

Related Article: Everyone Wants Multi-Agent Systems, But Few Are Ready

Taking the AI Road Less Travelled

The flashy phase of AI is peaking. Going forward, AI will have to earn its keep. AI's competitive edge isn't just in better models or smarter prompts, it's in connecting AI to the live, operational pulse of the business from day one. Those who succeed will be the companies that can bridge the gap between a cool demo and a secure, governed and engineered reality that delivers value to specific uses cases in their business.

It's now time to get down to the fundamentals of strong implementations that ensure data security, improve the context of every model and allow agents to work together in a robust enterprise infrastructure.

fa-solid fa-hand-paper Learn how you can join our contributor community.

About the Author
Edward Funnekotter

Edward Funnekotter serves as the Chief Architect and AI Officer at Solace. He leads the architecture teams for both Cloud and Event Broker products, as well as the company’s strategic direction for AI integration within products and internal tools. Connect with Edward Funnekotter:

Main image: hxdyl | Adobe Stock
Featured Research