Feature
Few-shot prompting, once an obscure term in AI circles, is fast becoming a defining technique for improving how large language models (LLMs) respond to complex or nuanced tasks. It strikes a practical balance between zero-shot and one-shot prompting, blending precision with adaptability across a range of enterprise and creative use cases.
For IT leaders and developers fine-tuning AI systems, few-shot prompting offers a structured yet flexible way to coax models into producing results that are not just correct, but contextually and stylistically on point.
Table of Contents
- What Is Few-Shot Prompting?
- Where Few-Shot Prompting Excels
- Real-World Examples of Few-Shot Prompts
- Where Few-Shot Prompting Works — and Where It Doesn’t
- Best Practices in Few-Shot Prompt Design
- Few-Shot Prompting FAQs
What Is Few-Shot Prompting?
Few-shot prompting is a prompt engineering technique where the user provides the AI model with examples (typically between two and 10) before asking it to perform a task. In contrast, zero-shot prompting gives no examples and one-shot prompting gives only one example prior to the task.
An example of a few-shot prompt:
You are writing short, professional but friendly workplace emails.
Example 1
Input: Ask for a project update
Output: Hi Alex, just checking in to see how the project is coming along. Let me know if you need anything from me. Thanks!
Example 2
Input: Schedule a meeting
Output: Hi Sam, are you available for a 30-minute meeting sometime this week to go over next steps? I’ll send a calendar invite once I hear from you. Thanks!
Task
Now write an email for the following:
Follow up after no response to a proposal
Where Few-Shot Prompting Excels
Most modern LLMs are benchmarked using zero-shot tests to measure baseline performance without guidance, according to Josh Meier, senior generative AI lab author at Pluralsight.
Few-shot prompting, by contrast, evaluates a model’s in-context learning ability, which more closely mirrors real-world use. This makes it especially relevant for enterprise developers or IT professionals fine-tuning AI tools for business applications, where the model needs both accuracy and flexibility.
“Few-shot prompting is seen as the sweet spot because it provides enough context for the model to understand the task’s requirements and desired output style, reducing ambiguity and errors, while still allowing the model to generate creative responses,” explained Tim Law, research director for AI and automation at IDC.
That balance is critical as organizations apply AI to workflows that require domain expertise — whether in IT operations, cybersecurity or technical writing — where an overly rigid or generic output can undermine productivity.
Related Article: Prompt Engineering: Techniques, Examples and Best Practices
Real-World Examples of Few-Shot Prompts
Few-shot prompting can shape more consistent, domain-specific results.
Standardizing Outputs
Meier pointed to one example where an LLM extracts company and position titles from text.
A series of example sentences — such as “Maria joined Google as a data scientist” and “Jeff joined Meta as a data analyst” — teaches the model to output results in a standard format, like:
- Company: Google
- Position: Data Scientist
Sentiment Analysis
In another example, Law offered a sentiment analysis prompt where the model is trained with several example reviews and their corresponding labels — Positive, Neutral or Negative.
“The engineer would provide two more such examples and then prompt the LLM to complete the sentiment for an example input,” he explains.
Industry-Specific Outputs
Law also pointed to a domain-specific case in medical transcription, where providing example dictations and their formatted transcriptions helps the model maintain consistency with professional terminology and structure.
“Few-shot prompting excels in use cases where context and subtlety matter, such as text classification, sentiment analysis, summarization, translation and tone adaptation,” he noted.
Webinar
Dec
9
Rebrand. Migrate. Optimize. How to Do It All (Without Slowing Down)
Cresta leveled up site speed, design flexibility and marketer sanity (in record time). Find out how.
Register
Webinar
Dec
17
[EIS Webinar] Beyond the Pilot: Why Most GenAI Projects Fail to Scale and How to Become One of the Success Stories
Move from experimental projects to integrated solutions that drive strategic decision-making.
Register
Webinar
On demand
From Manual to Magical: How AI Transforms CX Teams
Learn how to replace manual support processes with automation that actually delivers.
Watch Now
Webinar
On demand
How to Build a Solid Knowledge Foundation for AI Success
See how leading brands keep their AI honest, compliant and actually helpful.
Watch Now
Webinar
On demand
Fix the Content Bottleneck: Build a Better WebOps Strategy
Content stalled? Dev overloaded? You’re not the only one. Learn how streamlined WebOps bridges the publishing gap.
Watch Now
Webinar
On demand
Beyond Storage: Smarter Content, Bigger Impact with DAM + AI
Discover how the DAM + AI duo makes content smarter, stronger and more accessible.
Watch Now
Where Few-Shot Prompting Works — and Where It Doesn’t
Few-shot prompting isn’t always the right choice. Meier cautioned it works best for classification tasks or other situations where ambiguity exists.
For straightforward factual questions — like definitions or basic coding examples — extra examples can actually “confuse a model” or bias its responses. In this case, said Law, more isn’t necessarily better.
“Don’t use few-shot approaches when one-shot will do the job,” he explained. “Organizations should carefully balance the need for few-shot examples with cost and performance requirements."
In cases where few-shot prompting makes sense, aim for concise examples that optimize token usage.
Related Article: 14 Top Prompt Engineering Certifications
Best Practices in Few-Shot Prompt Design
Designing effective few-shot prompts is an iterative process. Meier advised starting with clear success metrics and baselines. He recommended:
- Begin with zero-shot prompts to establish a baseline
- Iterate with few-shot examples to address common errors
- Identity patterns in misclassifications and use them to inform your examples
Prompt engineering is not a once-and-done event, added Law, who recommended ongoing evaluation whenever business requirements or model capabilities change — which is typically constant. “Few-shot approaches won’t help if you’ve chosen the wrong model, especially for domain-specific scenarios."
Prompt engineering is also a growing strategic discipline, and good prompts are a company asset that can be an important part of a company's IP. In fact, many companies are now turning to prompt management systems that track prompt iterations and which prompts work best for certain tasks.
Law explained, “Well-constructed prompts can make human workers more productive, facilitate rapid adoption of AI and increase user satisfaction when done right."
Few-Shot Prompting FAQs
There is no universal number, but most practitioners see strong performance with 2 to 10 examples. Fewer than two may not establish reliable patterns, while more than 10 can increase token costs and risk overfitting or response bias.
Yes. Few-shot prompting increases token consumption, since each example is processed as part of the prompt. In high-volume enterprise workflows, this can significantly impact API costs if not carefully managed.
Common tools include:
- Prompt management platforms
- LLM orchestration frameworks
- Observability and prompt versioning systems
- Agent frameworks with memory layers
These tools help track performance, cost and reliability over time.
Few-shot prompting should be avoided when:
- Tasks are purely factual
- Latency must be extremely low
- Token budgets are tightly constrained
- Deterministic outputs are required
In these cases, system prompts or structured rules are often more reliable.
