A person walks on a trail near a lighthouse and the Pacific Ocean.
Editorial

Collaborative Governance Is the Path to Globally Inclusive and Ethical AI

4 minute read
Emily Barnes avatar
By
SAVED
How should nations and companies approach AI regulation?

During one of my recent presentations on mitigating bias in artificial intelligence (AI), I explored the influence of bias within AI across various sectors. A thought-provoking question was raised by a member of the audience: Why should the everyday professional be concerned about bias in AI? My response noted an urgent necessity for structured governance in the realm of AI.

Presently, the development and deployment of AI are predominantly driven by capitalist motives, prioritizing profit over the potential for AI to serve as a tool for broader societal equity and advancement. This mindset poses a significant challenge to realizing the promise of AI as a force for good, capable of enhancing human capabilities and fostering a more equitable world. The creators of AI technologies, particularly large language models (LLMs), often focus on serving a narrow segment of society — those already benefiting from AI, those who have contributed to its training data or those with ample resources.

This scenario leaves the broad global population at a disadvantage, which amplifies the need for inclusive and ethical AI development practices. It's a sharp reminder that, until recently, a comprehensive strategy to reduce AI bias was visibly absent.

As we delve further into the complexities of artificial intelligence, the urgency for effective governance mechanisms becomes increasingly clear. The recent unanimous endorsement of the United Nations' first resolution on AI by countries worldwide marks a watershed moment, signaling a collective acknowledgment of the imperative for ethical guidelines governing AI's utilization. This historic consensus heralds a call to action for both governments and business sectors to collaboratively oversee AI's advancement, ensuring its potential is harnessed for the common good while conscientiously mitigating any adverse effects on our collective welfare.

Closing the Gap Between Innovation and Regulation

The dance between innovation and regulation in AI is like trying to walk a tightrope. On one side, the pace at which AI evolves demands a level of flexibility and adaptability that traditional regulatory processes may not provide. This is where the argument for self-regulation by the tech industry gains ground. Companies entrenched in AI development argue that their close relationship with the technology allows for a more nuanced approach to its governance, which may potentially enable innovation to flourish without being challenged by outdated or overly broad regulations. This self-regulation, they claim, can more effectively anticipate and mitigate the ethical dilemmas posed by AI's rapid advancement.

However, history teaches us that leaving industries to their own devices doesn't always result in the most ethically sound or socially beneficial outcomes. For example, in 2018, Facebook faced ethical backlash for its AI creation without sufficient regulation. The social media giant was embroiled in a scandal involving Cambridge Analytica, a political consulting firm that harvested the personal data of millions of Facebook users without their consent and used it to create targeted political ads. This was done through an app that exploited Facebook's policies on data access by third-party developers, which allowed them to collect the data of the app's users and their friends' data. The app was also disguised as a personality quiz, misleading users about its true purpose. The scandal raised serious concerns about Facebook's role in safeguarding user privacy, preventing misinformation and protecting democratic processes from foreign interference. It also exposed the lack of oversight and accountability for the ethical use of AI by the tech industry, which has the power to influence public opinion and behavior through its platforms and algorithms.

Without external checks, the race for innovation can lead to corners being cut and ethical considerations being overlooked in favor of progress and profit. Governmental intervention, therefore, becomes essential to ensuring that AI development aligns with societal values and ethical standards. It's not about stifling innovation, but guiding it to ensure that advances in AI contribute positively to society without compromising safety or ethical integrity. The UN resolution represents a collective acknowledgment of the need for this guidance, aiming to foster an environment where innovation and regulation support one another, ensuring AI's benefits are maximized while its risks are minimized.

Cultivating a Global Consensus on AI's Ethical Use

AI’s transformative potential stretches beyond global regions and boundaries. Its ability to revolutionize industries, redefine work and reshape societies is a global phenomenon. Yet, the benefits and burdens of AI are not equally distributed evenly across the globe.

The UN resolution on AI governance is a clear call for inclusivity, urging that the voices of all nations, especially those from the developing world, be heard in the conversation about AI's future. This inclusivity supports the idea that the frameworks developed for AI governance should be comprehensive, considerate of diverse needs and reflective of a broad range of cultural and societal norms.

The goal is to ensure that AI does not become a luxury of the wealthy nations or a tool that widens the digital divide. Instead, AI should be a catalyst for global development, a tool that elevates societies by addressing key challenges, such as health care, education and environmental sustainability. If we can build a consensus that spans continents, the international community can leverage AI to close gaps rather than create them, ensuring that the digital age's benefits are accessible to all. This consensus isn't just about fairness. It's about harnessing collective human intellect and creativity to guide AI’s development in ways that honor our shared humanity and mutual aspirations for a better world.

Fostering Ethical AI Through Collaborative Governance

The path to ethical AI is fraught with complexity, demanding a concerted effort from governments, industries and civil societies around the globe. The UN's initiative to forge a global framework for AI regulation exemplifies the power and potential of collaborative governance. This approach recognizes that the multifaceted ethical challenges AI presents cannot be addressed in isolation. Instead, it requires a broad scope of voices, each contributing diverse perspectives and insights.

This collaborative model doesn't merely mitigate harm. It actively seeks to harness AI's potential to serve the common good, enhancing human welfare and advancing public interests. Envisioning a future where AI aligns with our highest ideals, the global endorsement of the UN resolution is a testament to our collective commitment for positive transformation in our increasingly interconnected world.

Learning Opportunities

Our Next Journey

Our next journey toward ethical AI can be a world where AI systems are not only powerful and innovative, but also compassionate and equitable, designed with the well-being of all people in mind. The enthusiastic support for the UN resolution across nations and cultures is a powerful reminder that, despite our differences, we share a common hope for a future where AI is free of bias, and technology uplifts humanity. As we navigate the challenges and opportunities of AI together, we have a unique opportunity to shape a future that reflects our collective values and aspirations, ensuring that AI becomes a force for good in the world.

fa-solid fa-hand-paper Learn how you can join our contributor community.

About the Author
Emily Barnes

Dr. Emily Barnes is a leader and researcher with over 15 years in higher education who's focused on using technology, AI and ML to innovate education and support women in STEM and leadership, imparting her expertise by teaching and developing related curricula. Her academic research and operational strategies are informed by her educational background: a Ph.D. in artificial intelligence from Capitol Technology University, an Ed.D. in higher education administration from Maryville University, an M.L.I.S. from Indiana University Indianapolis and a B.A. in humanities and philosophy from Indiana University. Connect with Emily Barnes:

Main image: By Josh Hild.
Featured Research