Organizations don’t need to develop their own frameworks to begin experimenting with AI agents. A range of platforms — StackAI, Relevance and SuperOps, along with enterprise-grade tools like IBM WatsonX Orchestrator — offer ready-made environments with built-in workflows and integrations.
Elyson De La Cruz, senior member at the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), explained that using managed platforms with built-in security and governance is one of the safer ways for enterprises to dip their toes into AI agents. “Rather than building from scratch, you can experiment with vendor-supported sandboxes that allow you to test scenarios without exposing sensitive systems."
Table of Contents
- Choosing Your AI Agent Stack: No-Code, Frameworks & Plugins
- Testing AI Agents Safely: The Role of Sandboxes and Synthetic Data
- How to Measure AI Agent Pilot Success Before Full Deployment
- Frequently Asked Questions
Choosing Your AI Agent Stack: No-Code, Frameworks & Plugins
No-Code Pros
No-code and low-code agent builders are designed to help teams move quickly. By chaining prompts, APIs and workflows through a visual interface, IT teams can test simple use cases such as an agent that checks calendars, drafts client follow-ups or updates CRM systems. This kind of rapid prototyping is easily achievable in platforms like Relevance AI or StackAI.
No-Code Cons
But the limitations surface quickly. Once organizations need more advanced functionality — such as memory, branching logic or deeper reasoning — the no-code approach falls short.
“These tools often don’t scale beyond a pilot,” De La Cruz said. “Organizations generally need a certain degree of customization and control before enterprise-wide adoption.” Enterprises also eventually need deeper integration into systems such as identity management, observability and compliance systems, he added.
When to Level Up
When organizations require customization, teams often need to shift toward writing code in Python or moving to more advanced frameworks such as LangChain or WatsonX Orchestrator to support enterprise-grade deployments.
“No-code and low-code are fantastic for proof-of-concept work, but less so for long-term production deployments,” De La Cruz noted.
Expanding With Plugins & Integrations
Plugins provide an effective way to extend an agent’s capabilities without opening access to everything in the tech stack.
They allow scoped, pre-defined actions — for example, pulling customer data from Salesforce or submitting tickets in ServiceNow. This ability gives agents value in real workflows while maintaining strict boundaries around what data they can access and what tasks they can perform. It’s a safe middle ground during early testing, balancing experimentation with governance.
Related Article: AI Agent vs. Agentic AI: What’s the Difference — And Why It Matters
Testing AI Agents Safely: The Role of Sandboxes and Synthetic Data
Best practice dictates treating AI agents like any other critical automation: test in isolation before production.
Synthetic or scrubbed data should be used initially to prevent exposure of sensitive information, while contained sandboxes allow organizations to monitor behavior and identify unpredictable outcomes as logic chains become more complex. “Balancing agility with security, you want the agent to be useful, but you also want to know exactly what data it can see and what actions it can take,” said De La Cruz.
Platforms such as WatsonX Orchestrator, StackAI or LangChain enable this kind of controlled experimentation via sandboxes, giving IT leaders the ability to observe how agents operate under stress before integrating them into live environments.
This structured approach builds confidence and reduces the likelihood of unintended consequences.
How to Measure AI Agent Pilot Success Before Full Deployment
Evaluating the success of autonomous agent pilots requires a pragmatic approach.
- Track Key Metrics. Organizations should track whether the agent reduces workload by measuring AI performance metrics like task completion times, error rates, frequency of human intervention and overall customer satisfaction.
- Consider Cost. Some agent stacks appear effective until token usage or compute expenses accumulate.
- Scale at the Right Time. If the pilot delivers time savings and efficiency without requiring daily oversight, it is likely ready for broader deployment; if not, the project may need to be re-scoped or re-engineered before moving forward.
- Look at Trust & Accuracy. Organizations must determine if the agent handled edge cases correctly and whether employees or customers felt comfortable with its outputs.
- Build In Adaptability. Can you monitor, audit and retrain the system if regulations change or new risks emerge? asked De La Cruz.
Ultimately, he said, “If the pilot demonstrates both business value and reliable governance, then there is a strong case to expand.”