An employee types on a laptop computer.
Editorial

The False Economy of AI Content Creation

4 minute read
Emily Barnes avatar
By
SAVED
What should creators know before they create with AI?

During a recent meeting, I listened as a CEO recounted how another company used AI to generate content, achieving significant cost savings. She saw potential for similar efficiencies in her own company’s content creation processes. However, this reliance on AI, while seemingly innovative, presents substantial risks. Unfortunately, this was not the first time I heard such a narrative. It has become a common discussion among creative professionals and their CEOs. As someone with a front-row seat to the AI movement across higher education and corporate sectors, I want to demystify this phenomenon and share my critical assessment of using AI in place of genuine human creativity and insight. For those seeking the no-nonsense, dollar-and-cents explanation, I explore financial liabilities and provide insights into why the apparent economy of AI content creation is fundamentally flawed.

The Human Element

Creativity and Innovation

AI models, like ChatGPT, fundamentally rely on pre-existing information to generate content. These models analyze vast data sets to identify patterns and produce text, but they lack the capability to conceive genuinely new ideas or concepts. As a result, AI-generated content often mirrors existing knowledge and trends, limiting its potential for true innovation. This reliance on pre-existing information leads to a cycle of imitation rather than fostering original thought.

For example, when tasked with creating an article on a novel scientific discovery, ChatGPT may compile a coherent and well-structured piece. However, the content would be synthesized from existing data and previously published works, lacking the unique perspective that human authors can provide. The AI may fail to capture the nuanced implications of the discovery, the potential for future research and the broader impact on the field — elements that are crucial for truly innovative and proprietary content.

Human creativity is driven by unique experiences, perspectives and the ability to think beyond established norms. Human writers draw upon their diverse backgrounds and personal insights to craft content that is not only informative, but also original and thought-provoking. They challenge conventional wisdom, explore uncharted territories and introduce novel ideas that push the boundaries of knowledge and understanding. Studies have shown that teams with diverse backgrounds and perspectives produce more innovative solutions compared to homogeneous teams (Page, 2007).

Emotional and Cultural Relevance

Human insight is also crucial for creating content that resonates emotionally and culturally with audiences. Marketers, for example, understand the subtleties of consumer behavior, cultural nuances and emotional triggers that resonate with target audiences. They can craft messages that are not only compelling, but also uniquely tailored to the brand’s identity and values. AI, in contrast, lacks the ability to fully grasp these nuances and emotional complexities.

Consider the development of a marketing campaign for a new product. While AI can generate a plethora of slogan options and ad copy based on past successful campaigns, it is the human touch that infuses these elements with creativity and relevance. This ensures the content stands out in the market and drives long-term engagement and loyalty. 

Business and Legal Elements

Intellectual Property, Copyright and Ownership

One of the most significant risks associated with AI-generated content is the potential for intellectual property (IP) issues. AI models, like ChatGPT, are trained on vast data sets that include a wide range of texts from various sources. This means that the content generated by AI could inadvertently replicate, plagiarize or closely resemble existing copyrighted material. Companies relying on AI for content creation risk producing derivative works that may infringe on existing copyrights, leading to potential legal battles and financial liabilities.

Moreover, AI-generated content may inadvertently include proprietary or confidential information from its sources, raising concerns about intellectual property theft. If sensitive or restricted information is unknowingly used in public content, companies could be held liable for breaches of intellectual property laws and confidentiality agreements. This not only exposes the company to legal risks, but also to significant financial risks.

The issue of ownership is also complex. Who owns the content created by AI? Is it the company using the AI, the developers of the AI model or the authors of the original data used to train the model? These questions are currently in a legal gray area, and the lack of clear guidelines can lead to disputes and legal challenges. Companies must be cautious and seek legal advice to navigate these uncertain waters to avoid costly legal disputes and potential financial losses.

Privacy Concerns and Inadvertent Cyber Crime Security Breaches

AI-generated content also raises significant privacy concerns. AI models often require large amounts of data to function effectively, and this data can include sensitive and personal information. There is a risk that AI-generated content could inadvertently reveal confidential information and be used to infer private details about individuals. For example, someone may upload documents containing restricted information to an AI system, like ChatGPT. This content could then be used to inform another person's chat, potentially exposing sensitive data. Such scenarios can lead to breaches of privacy regulations, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe, which imposes strict requirements on the handling of personal data.

Failure to adhere to these regulations can result in hefty fines, reputational damage and loss of consumer trust. Therefore, it is crucial for companies to ensure their use of AI respects privacy and data protection principles to avoid these significant risks. The financial implications of non-compliance with privacy laws can be severe, with penalties reaching up to 4% of a company's annual global turnover under GDPR.

Conclusion: Striking the Right Balance

The CEO’s enthusiasm for using ChatGPT to reduce content creation costs is understandable, given the allure of efficiency and cost savings. However, this approach overlooks the critical importance of originality, authenticity and human creativity in producing truly innovative proprietary content. By recognizing the limitations of AI, businesses can strike a balance that leverages the strengths of both AI and human creativity to produce content that drives long-term success and also avoids the false economy of AI-driven imitation.

fa-solid fa-hand-paper Learn how you can join our contributor community.

About the Author
Emily Barnes

Dr. Emily Barnes is a leader and researcher with over 15 years in higher education who's focused on using technology, AI and ML to innovate education and support women in STEM and leadership, imparting her expertise by teaching and developing related curricula. Her academic research and operational strategies are informed by her educational background: a Ph.D. in artificial intelligence from Capitol Technology University, an Ed.D. in higher education administration from Maryville University, an M.L.I.S. from Indiana University Indianapolis and a B.A. in humanities and philosophy from Indiana University. Connect with Emily Barnes:

Main image: By Kaitlyn Baker.
Featured Research