Child wearing a colorful winter hat, purple coat and striped leggings running through a corn maze lined with tall, dry stalks on a bright autumn day.
Editorial

The Maze of AI in Marketing: What Should We Do First?

8 minute read
Brian Riback avatar
By
SAVED
AI spend is soaring, yet most marketing teams can’t operationalize it. The fix isn’t another tool — it’s sequencing.

The Gist

  • AI adoption is widespread but shallow. Three in four marketing organizations are already using or testing AI, yet fewer than 1% report true maturity.
  • Budgets outpace readiness. Nearly one in five marketers dedicate over 40% of spend to AI, but most lack the skills and structure to operationalize it.
  • Choice overload is stalling progress. Marketers face dozens of AI use cases—content, personalization, analytics, automation—with no clear sequence for adoption.
  • Pilots fail without sequencing. Teams jump into flashy use cases before fixing data, workflows, or governance, leading to wasted effort and stalled momentum.
  • Clarity is the new advantage. Success depends on disciplined sequencing: define the first step, build the foundation, and scale in order. 

The other day, I was researching something called Model Context Protocol, or MCP. It is a framework that helps AI tools connect to different systems through a shared method. As I was reading about it, I started thinking about AI more broadly. Not the technology itself, but the experience marketers face when trying to figure out how to use it.

That is the real challenge right now. There are dozens of possible entry points for AI: content generation, personalization, analytics, automation, journey design, reporting. Each one looks valuable. But with so many options, how do marketers know where to start? What should come first? What can wait? And how do we know that the path we choose is the right one, not just the easiest or the newest?

That line of thought stayed with me because it gets to the heart of why AI adoption feels overwhelming. The problem is not whether AI works. The problem is knowing how to approach it: what to do first, where it will take us and how to avoid chasing the wrong priorities.

Table of Contents

AI in Marketing Reality: Too Many Options

AI is already embedded in marketing more than any other business function. 60% of marketers use AI daily. Budgets reflect that adoption: nearly one in five marketing departments dedicate more than 40% of spend to AI, and over half plan to increase that allocation this year.

AI Adoption Snapshot

Key statistics illustrating the scale of AI integration and spending in marketing departments.

MetricStatistic
Marketers using AI daily60%
Departments allocating 40%+ of budget to AINearly 1 in 5
Organizations reaching AI maturityLess than 1%
Marketers planning to increase AI spendOver 50%

On paper, this looks like progress. Marketers are buying tools, launching pilots and building AI into their workflows. But the sheer scale of options is overwhelming. Content generation tools promise speed. Personalization engines promise relevance. Analytics platforms promise foresight. Automation promises scale. Each one is positioned as urgent.

The result is choice overload. Faced with dozens of possible entry points, marketers struggle to identify which one matters most. Without direction, they either dabble everywhere or hesitate to commit anywhere. Both approaches lead to stalled progress.

Related Article: Scott Brinker: The Four AI Agents Every Marketing Team Needs to Know

Why Marketing Teams Stall Despite Heavy AI Investment

Despite billions in spend, fewer than 1% of organizations report reaching AI maturity. The barriers are not technical flaws in the tools. They are sequencing problems.

  • Operational readiness. Yes. I’m bringing this up again as I do in almost every article I write because it is that important. 67% of marketers cite lack of education and training as the primary barrier to AI adoption. But I don’t believe training is the answer. Companies often turn to training as the fix, but that does not solve the issue. The real test is whether tools can be operationalized by existing staff. If not, the sequence is already broken: you cannot start with pilots that require expertise you do not have. Gaps must be filled selectively, but success depends on aligning AI with how teams work today.
  • Data quality. Nearly half of marketing data is incomplete or inaccurate. CMOs admit less than half of their data can be trusted. Broken inputs mean AI cannot deliver reliable outputs. Personalization or predictive analytics cannot be the first step if the data foundation is weak. Data must be addressed early in the sequence.
  • Integration. Ninety-five percent of AI pilots fail to show measurable business impact. The reason is not tool performance but lack of integration. Nearly half of marketers still cannot activate real-time data in campaigns. Automation or advanced customer journey design cannot come first if systems do not connect.
  • Trust. Consumers are wary. Fewer than half believe companies will use AI responsibly, and trust levels are declining. Executives share those concerns, citing data leakage and flawed outputs. If governance is missing, scaling AI becomes a reputational risk.

Barriers to AI Maturity

Core issues preventing marketing teams from realizing AI’s full potential.

BarrierDescription
Operational readiness67% of marketers cite lack of training and ability to operationalize tools with existing staff.
Data qualityNearly 50% of marketing data is inaccurate or incomplete, undermining personalization and analytics.
Integration95% of AI pilots fail to show measurable impact due to disconnected systems and data silos.
TrustLess than half of consumers believe brands will use AI responsibly, slowing adoption and scale.

Each barrier reflects the same truth: it is not enough to adopt AI; it has to be adopted in the right order.

The Psychology Behind Decision Paralysis in AI in Marketing

Marketers are not just battling operational gaps. They are battling the psychology of decision-making under pressure.

  • Choice overload makes decisions harder, not easier, when options multiply. AI presents too many.
  • Analysis paralysis locks teams into endless evaluation, searching for a “perfect” starting point.
  • Ambiguity effect drives avoidance of paths with uncertain outcomes. Many AI use cases feel ambiguous.
  • Loss aversion amplifies the fear of wasting budget or damaging trust, making inaction safer than bold moves.

These forces explain why so many teams bounce between pilots without progress. Shiny object syndrome is not just a lack of discipline; it is the predictable result of psychological pressure and no clear roadmap.

Infographic titled “Overcoming Decision Paralysis in AI Marketing,” showing two key steps: defining building blocks (reliable data, workflow alignment, and governance) and implementing advanced use cases (personalization and predictive modeling), illustrated on an orange background with simple icons and a stylized machine graphic.
An infographic illustrating how marketers can overcome decision paralysis in AI adoption by first establishing data, workflow and governance foundations before advancing to personalization and predictive modeling.Simpler Media Group

AI in Marketing Building Blocks: What Must Come First

The only way to cut through this paralysis is to define the building blocks that must come first. Without them, any other investment risks collapse.

  1. Reliable data. With nearly half of all data incomplete or inaccurate, the first step must be fixing the inputs. AI cannot compensate for poor data hygiene.
  2. Workflow alignment. AI must reside where work already occurs: inside CRMs, ESPs and analytics systems, not bolted on at the edges. If teams cannot use it in their daily flow, adoption fails.
  3. Governance. Rules for privacy, transparency and accountability must be set before rollout. Without guardrails, scaling AI erodes trust.

Only when these building blocks are in place does it make sense to layer on more advanced use cases like personalization, predictive modeling or journey orchestration.

Related Article: 6 Considerations for an AI Governance Strategy

Where to Start With AI Adoption

Once the foundations are in place, the next question is where to begin. Marketers face dozens of potential entry points, but not all make sense as a starting line. Some require mature data, complex integrations or advanced governance. Others deliver quick wins with fewer dependencies.

The best starting points share three traits:

  • Low dependency on data maturity. Tools like content acceleration, creative support or campaign automation often work with limited datasets. Advanced personalization or predictive analytics, by contrast, demand clean, structured data.
  • Direct impact on productivity. Early AI projects should save time or effort, cutting campaign build hours, automating reporting or streamlining creative work. Quick, visible wins create momentum.
  • Alignment with existing workflows. Adoption succeeds when AI fits where work already happens. Tools bolted onto the edges of systems rarely take hold.

This is why many organizations start with content acceleration, workflow automation or campaign optimization. Those use cases deliver value without requiring full-scale transformation.

How to Recognize the Right Path to AI in Marketing

After identifying possible entry points, marketers need signals to confirm whether they are moving in the right direction. Four tests matter most:

The decision should be grounded in the business benefit delivered, not the number of features a tool can demonstrate. Features create excitement, but only benefits create impact.

If adoption depends on skills or structures the team does not have, it is not the right first step. Or, if you lack the resources to make it operational, you must either adjust the scope or fill the gaps with additional personnel.

The first step should unlock future steps, not create dead ends. Tools that trap data or resist integration may solve today’s problem but block tomorrow’s progress.

Adoption should begin with a specific business problem, such as reducing build time, improving retention or increasing segmentation accuracy — not with a tool looking for a use.


A Disciplined Playbook for Sequencing AI

Here is what a structured, sequenced playbook looks like:

  • Start with the problem. Define the priority business challenge first.
  • Fix the data foundation. Suppress duplicates, verify accuracy and close gaps.
  • Align to workflows. Place AI inside the systems teams already use.
  • Establish governance. Decide who owns oversight and how privacy rules will apply.
  • Run targeted pilots. Focus on areas with clear KPIs and measurable outcomes.
  • Scale by sequence. Move from foundational wins to more advanced use cases.
  • Fill expertise gaps selectively. Bring in outside support only where operationalization cannot happen with current staff.

Sequenced AI Playbook

A step-by-step roadmap for disciplined, scalable AI adoption in marketing organizations.

StepPurpose
1. Start with the problemDefine the business challenge before selecting a tool.
2. Fix the data foundationEnsure clean, complete, and verified data inputs.
3. Align to workflowsIntegrate AI within existing CRMs, ESPs, and analytics tools.
4. Establish governanceSet privacy, transparency, and oversight rules before scaling.
5. Run targeted pilotsTest in areas with clear KPIs and measurable results.
6. Scale by sequenceExpand from foundational wins to advanced use cases.
7. Fill expertise gaps selectivelyBring in external support only where operational gaps exist.

This is not a checklist of generic best practices. It is a sequence. Each step makes the next one possible. Skip steps, and progress collapses.

Why Urgency Is Rising

The urgency is real. Budgets for AI are increasing rapidly, and high-performing teams are embedding AI deeply. Underperformers are stuck in pilots, falling further behind.

The gap is widening: leaders are cutting campaign times from 10 hours to two, increasing conversion rates by more than 30%, and embedding AI in customer retention strategies. Followers are still asking where to begin.

Learning Opportunities

The cost of delay is steep. Pilots without sequencing waste budget. Adoption without foundations damages trust. Waiting for certainty guarantees irrelevance.

The reward for moving with clarity is just as clear. Teams that operationalize in the right order are gaining speed, capacity and ROI: without adding headcount. The difference is not who has access to AI. The difference is who knows how to approach it.

Conclusion: From Pilots to Progress

The real challenge in AI adoption is not the tools. It is the lack of direction. Marketers face too many choices, too much pressure and no clear guide. The questions remain simple but urgent: What should we do first? Where will it take us? How do we know it is right?

The answer is not another demo. The answer is sequencing. A structured roadmap that fixes foundations first, aligns tools with workflows, and moves in order from problem to scale.

Marketers who build that roadmap now will move from pilots to progress. Those who do not will remain stuck in choice overload, chasing shiny objects while others pass them by.

The decision is no longer whether to adopt AI. The decision is how to adopt it with discipline.

fa-solid fa-hand-paper Learn how you can join our contributor community.

About the Author
Brian Riback

Brian Riback is a dedicated writer who sees every challenge as a puzzle waiting to be solved, blending analytical clarity with heartfelt advocacy to illuminate intricate strategies. Connect with Brian Riback:

Main image: Funderburke Photos | Adobe Stock
Featured Research