gears and cogs in a clock mechanism
Editorial

What Effective Data and AI Leaders Do Differently

4 minute read
Myles Suer avatar
By
SAVED
Are you building a data leadership role that sticks or one that gets sidelined? Learn what separates high-impact leaders from those who lose budget and clout.

Being an effective data leader requires the right conditions, the right skills and a relentless focus on priorities that matter. It also demands clear ownership, organizational support and the ability to translate data capabilities into real business value. Just as importantly, it requires personal adaptability.

As business requirements evolve — from analytics to generative AI to agentic AI — data leaders need to be able to continuously reshape teams, processes and investments to ensure alignment with the most critical outcomes.

Credibility Is the Currency for Data Leaders

Adaptation is not optional; it is the job. Staying focused on the business outcomes, operational activities and enterprise capabilities that matter most increases the odds of success. But perception matters too. Data leaders who are seen as effective are far more likely to secure the needed budget and executive backing to deliver on strategic goals.

Success builds credibility; credibility unlocks resources. Research from Dresner Advisory Services proves this rule:

  • Organizations running agentic AI rate their data leaders as extremely effective 89% of the time
  • Among those with GenAI in production, 57% say their data leader is extremely effective
  • Where a dedicated data leader exists, 98% find them somewhat to extremely effective — a share that has grown steadily since 2020

At the same time, regional differences are striking: 55% of Asia Pacific organizations report extremely effective data leadership, versus 31% in North America and just 18% in EMEA. 

These numbers also show that data leadership roles can fail to gain traction. When leaders do not align with the strategic outcomes that matter to executive leadership, reduced influence and constrained funding almost inevitably follow. Data leadership roles are most effective when they prioritize issues like data governance and data literacy, according to Howard Dresner, chief research officer at Dresner Advisory Services. "In the end, effectiveness is not defined by activity, but by measurable contribution to enterprise success."

Related Article: Why Bad Data Is Blocking AI Success — and How to Fix It

CDO or CAO: The New Default Data Leadership Titles

Chief Data Officer (CDO) and Chief Analytics Officer (CAO) are increasingly popular titles for enterprise data leadership — 57% of organizations use one of the two. 

No other titles come close. Aside from a loosely defined "other chief officer" category at 15%, every alternative appears in fewer than 10% of organizations. The market has clearly coalesced around CDO and CAO as the primary banners for data leadership.

These roles are most prevalent in manufacturing, financial services, technology, business services and healthcare. Manufacturing stands out in particular — not just for adoption, but for perceived impact. In this sector, 75% of organizations rate their CDO as extremely effective, and 72% say the same of their CAO. Having the title, however, does not guarantee success, but in certain industries the model is clearly delivering measurable business value.

That structure, however, may not remain static. As data tied to agentic AI becomes more embedded in operational systems and applications, responsibility may shift under the CIO. The gravitational pull of execution — where AI agents act, not just analyze — could redraw reporting lines and redefine where data leadership resides.

At the same time, successful business intelligence initiatives are increasingly connected to having formal data leadership. In many organizations, business intelligence teams and programs are no longer isolated reporting functions, they align with enterprise data strategy, governance and literacy efforts. As business intelligence becomes more integrated with broader data and AI initiatives, strong, clearly defined data leadership is proving to be less optional — and more foundational to sustained success.

How to Design a Data Function That Earns Executive Backing

Formal data leadership succeeds only when the organization intentionally designs it for impact. A title alone — adopted to mirror industry convention — does little. Instead, organizations must define the attributes, scope and expectations that make the data function indispensable to business counterparts.

Start With Business Outcomes

The starting point is outcomes, not organizational charts. It is crucial to identify the specific business results that stronger data capabilities can accelerate, such as:

  • Revenue growth
  • Cost optimization
  • Risk reduction
  • Customer experience
  • Operational resilience

This requires clarifying the value inflection points where improved governance, integration, analytics, data science and machine learning (DSML) and AI measurably advance enterprise goals. It also requires direct engagement with the business leaders who own those outcomes.

Data teams should align on where trusted, analytics-ready data change performance. Move the conversation away from abstract aspirations about "being data-driven" and toward concrete metrics — margin expansion, cycle-time reduction, market share growth. Data leadership must consistently speak the language of strategic value.

Design the Reporting Structure

With outcomes defined, design the reporting structure deliberately. Position the data organization where it will generate maximum visibility and enterprise impact — whether aligned with the CIO, COO or another executive sponsor.

As AI becomes increasingly embedded in operational workflows, be prepared to reposition the role to remain close to execution and decision authority.

Choose Leadership Wisely

Leadership selection is equally critical. Choose leaders who combine technical depth, business acumen and strong communication and influencing skills. Provide clear mandates, measurable objectives, aligned incentives and sufficient resources.

Titles should convey enterprise scope and strategic importance, reinforcing that data is a core business capability — not an administrative function.

Build a Team That Scales

Finally, build distributed teams capable of advancing governance, integration, AI literacy, analytics and AI at scale.

Many organizations remain immature in governance and integration; formal data leadership should elevate both. Establish an operating model — centralized, federated or hybrid — that scales capability across domains. And plan for evolution: regularly reassess scope, metrics and value delivery against targeted outcomes, while cultivating emerging capabilities and succession plans.

Data leadership is not static; it is a dynamic lever for enterprise transformation.

Related Article: What Actual AI Usage Data Tells Leaders About the Work Ahead

Future-Proofing Your Data Leadership Role

The research is clear: effective data leaders are not defined by title alone, but by alignment, adaptability and measurable impact. They anchor their mandate to strategic business outcomes, prioritize governance and literacy, integrate AI into operational value streams and position their teams where they can drive the greatest enterprise influence. At the same time, they secure credibility by delivering results — and convert credibility into sustained investment.

Learning Opportunities

Today's most effective data leaders are those who continuously evolve their scope, sharpen their focus on value and ensure data is not simply managed, but mobilized for competitive advantage.

fa-solid fa-hand-paper Learn how you can join our contributor community.

About the Author
Myles Suer

Myles Suer is an industry analyst, tech journalist and top CIO influencer (Leadtail). He is the emeritus leader of #CIOChat and a research director at Dresner Advisory Services. Connect with Myles Suer:

Main image: Andrey Kuzmin | Adobe Stock
Featured Research