Editorial
Have you ever considered what profession the three wise men who followed a star to Bethlehem may have had? Some scholars view them as leading astronomer-astrologers, skilled mathematicians who could predict eclipses, calculate planetary movements and interpret what these celestial events meant for earthly affairs.
This reference is intended as a historical example of how science and meaning were once intertwined, not as a theological claim. In their world, rigorous observation and meaning-making were not separate disciplines competing for legitimacy. They were unified practices, held together by trusted advisors who served both as scientists and counselors to rulers. This reference to Bethlehem is used here purely as a historical illustration rather than a religious assertion.
Today, as we study what it means to live with artificial intelligence that can process vast datasets but struggles with questions of meaning, ethics and human values, we might ask: What happened to that integration? And what can we learn from how it may have been lost?
Where Astronomy and Astrology Met
For thousands of years, astronomy and astrology were indistinguishable.
Babylonian priest-astronomers meticulously tracked celestial movements while offering interpretations about harvests, wars and the fate of empires. Medieval Islamic scholars advanced mathematical models of planetary motion while maintaining that these movements influenced human destiny. European court astronomers like Johannes Kepler (yes, the same Kepler whose laws govern orbital mechanics) cast horoscopes for nobility while revolutionizing our understanding of how planets move.
These ancient practitioners did not see any contradiction between careful observation and human meaning-making. They were bridge-builders, equally comfortable with mathematical precision and symbolic interpretation. They offered both the what of celestial mechanics and the why of human significance.
Related Article: The Genius Machines Can’t Touch: Why Authenticity Is Becoming an Enterprise Safeguard
The Great Separation
The Scientific Revolution changed everything.
Starting in the 16th century, figures like Copernicus, Galileo and Newton began emphasizing empirical observation and mathematical modeling over interpretive meanings. This gave us extraordinary precision in understanding the physical universe, but it also came at a cost.
By the 18th century, the split was complete. Astronomy became the domain of universities, observatories and scientific institutions, focused on physical laws and measurable phenomena. Astrology was increasingly dismissed by the scientific establishment as superstition. The ancient role of trusted advisor who could speak both languages, empirical and interpretive, largely disappeared from public life.
References to astrology here are made in its historical context, not as a validation of its modern practice.
The Cost of a Fractured Enterprise
Fast-forward to today, and we see this same fracturing everywhere.
We have scientists who can explain climate change in technical terms but often struggle to convey why it matters for human values. We have technologists building powerful AI systems while philosophers and ethicists debate their implications in separate conversations. We have spiritual communities often emphasising meaning and purpose while scientific communities emphasise data and evidence, and these groups can sometimes operate in parallel with little dialogue.
This split has created "expertise silos," highly developed knowledge in narrow domains, but few trusted voices who can bridge between rigorous thinking and human meaning-making. An astronomer today receives university positions, research funding and professional respect. Someone exploring how celestial patterns might relate to human psychology or meaning often operates on the margins, lacking institutional support.
The result? When people need guidance on complex issues, from climate change to genetic engineering to artificial intelligence, they often have to choose between technical expertise that feels emotionally cold and meaning-making approaches that lack empirical rigor. The middle ground, where careful observation meets human wisdom, has become increasingly rare.
Related Article: The Fragile Golden Egg: Protecting Human Connection in the Age of AI
Enter AI: Amplifying the Confusion
Now artificial intelligence arrives into this already-fractured landscape, and the problems multiply.
We are developing incredibly sophisticated technology using the "astronomy" approach, focusing on what AI can do, how it processes information and how to make it more capable. Meanwhile, questions about meaning, ethics and human values are often treated as separate concerns, handled by different people in different institutions.
AI can analyse millions of data points to predict market trends, but who interprets what this means for human flourishing? Machine learning (ML) can identify patterns in human behavior, but who asks whether we should act on these insights? Large language models (LLMs) can generate human-like text, but who determines the wisdom of amplifying certain voices and perspectives over others?
The Modern Split: Tech vs. Humanity
We have essentially created a modern version of the astronomy-astrology split: technical capability divorced from wisdom about human meaning and values. And just as the ancient separation left people without trusted advisors who could speak both languages, our current approach leaves society without sufficient guidance on how to integrate AI's power with human wisdom.
This shows up in our public discourse about AI, which often swings between extremes: either breathless enthusiasm about technological possibilities or apocalyptic warnings about existential risks.
Missing is the nuanced middle ground where we might ask deeper questions:
- How do we ensure AI serves human flourishing?
- What does it mean to live well alongside increasingly capable machines?
- How do we preserve human agency and meaning in an automated world?
Lessons for Business: A Hypothetical Case Study
Consider a technology company racing to release a new AI-driven product. Its engineering team, the astronomers, focus on precision, performance and technical capacity. Its ethics and design teams, the astrologers, are siloed, brought in late or ignored altogether. The result? A product that performs brilliantly in controlled tests but fails in the market because it overlooks human trust, cultural nuance or ethical risks.
This scenario is fictional, but it reflects real-world failures where companies have suffered reputational damage, regulatory penalties or product recalls because technical excellence was not balanced with human wisdom. The lesson for leaders is clear: integration matters. Building bridges between disciplines is not optional; it is a condition for sustainable success.
For organizations:
- Establish cross-functional teams that bring together technical, ethical and human-centered expertise from the start
- Elevate ethics and human factors to the same status as engineering and design
- Monitor not just AI performance metrics but also indicators of trust, well-being and cultural alignment
- Ensure that C-suite leaders champion integration as a strategic priority
Related Article: AI Won’t Adopt Human Morality — It’ll Build Its Own
What We Lost — and What We Might Regain
The ancient astronomer-astrologers were not perfect, but they embodied something valuable: the integration of rigorous observation with human meaning-making. They understood that people need both accurate information about how the world works and wisdom about how to live well within it.
Webinar
Dec
2
From Manual to Magical: How AI Transforms CX Teams
Learn how to replace manual support processes with automation that actually delivers.
Register
Webinar
Dec
9
Rebrand. Migrate. Optimize. How to Do It All (Without Slowing Down)
Cresta leveled up site speed, design flexibility and marketer sanity (in record time). Find out how.
Register
Webinar
Dec
17
[EIS Webinar] Beyond the Pilot: Why Most GenAI Projects Fail to Scale and How to Become One of the Success Stories
Move from experimental projects to integrated solutions that drive strategic decision-making.
Register
Webinar
On demand
How to Build a Solid Knowledge Foundation for AI Success
See how leading brands keep their AI honest, compliant and actually helpful.
Watch Now
Webinar
On demand
Fix the Content Bottleneck: Build a Better WebOps Strategy
Content stalled? Dev overloaded? You’re not the only one. Learn how streamlined WebOps bridges the publishing gap.
Watch Now
Webinar
On demand
Beyond Storage: Smarter Content, Bigger Impact with DAM + AI
Discover how the DAM + AI duo makes content smarter, stronger and more accessible.
Watch Now
Today's fractured approach has given us remarkable technical capabilities but left many people feeling unmoored. We have incredible tools but often lack wisdom about how to use them well. We can measure and optimize for almost anything, but struggle with questions about what is worth measuring and why.
The cost of this separation becomes clearer as AI becomes more powerful. Without integrated frameworks that combine technical understanding with human wisdom, we risk developing increasingly sophisticated tools while losing touch with deeper questions about purpose, meaning and what it means to flourish as human beings.
Lessons for Our AI Future
The story of astronomy and astrology's separation offers several insights for how we might approach AI more wisely:
- We need modern bridge-builders, people and institutions comfortable with both technical precision and questions of human meaning. This might look like technologists who seriously engage with ethics and philosophy, or philosophers who understand enough about AI to offer meaningful guidance about its implications.
- We should resist false choices between rigorous thinking and meaning-making. Just as the ancient practitioners did not see contradiction between careful observation and human significance, we need not choose between technical capability and wisdom about human flourishing.
- Integration requires intentional effort. The split between astronomy and astrology emerged from particular historical circumstances and institutional pressures. Similarly, the current separation between AI development and wisdom about human values is not predetermined. We can choose to build bridges.
- Public trust depends on trusted advisors. People need guidance they can trust on complex issues like AI. This requires voices that can speak both languages, technical and human, much like those ancient astronomer-astrologers served as advisors to rulers precisely because they combined rigorous expertise with wisdom about human affairs.
Reconnecting the Stars
Perhaps the most important lesson from this historical parallel is that integration is possible. For millennia, humanity successfully combined careful observation of natural phenomena with meaning-making about human life. The separation we have inherited is a historical accident that we can learn to heal.
As we stand at the threshold of an AI-transformed world, we have a choice. We can continue down the path of increasing specialization and fragmentation, developing ever more powerful tools while losing wisdom about how to use them well. Or we can learn from those ancient bridge-builders and work to reconnect technical capability with human wisdom.
The stars that guided those wise men to Bethlehem represented both precise astronomical knowledge and profound meaning about human destiny. To live with AI, we may need that same integration: the focus to understand how these powerful systems work, combined with the wisdom to ensure they serve human development.
Navigating Our Technological Future
The ancient split between astronomy and astrology may seem like distant history, but its echoes shape our present moment. Understanding how we lost that integration, and what we might do to regain it, could be essential for navigating our technological future with both competence and wisdom.
After all, the stars are still there, waiting to guide us toward both knowledge and meaning. The question is whether we will learn once again to read them with integrated eyes.
The path forward requires neither rejecting technological progress nor abandoning questions of human meaning, but learning to hold both together, just as those ancient astronomer-astrologers once did, and as our future may demand once again.
Learn how you can join our contributor community.
